Follow us on Google News
Get the latest updates directly in your Google News feed
The gaming industry has seen significant changes in recent years. Joe Tung, an experienced producer who has worked on popular franchises such asDestiny,Halo, andLeague of Legends, shared his perspective on the industry’s evolution.
The traditional model of selling games as standalone products is facing competition from the games-as-a-service approach, which emphasizes regular content updates and additional revenue streams. Tung, an industry veteran, recently explained why he prefers this approach.
A New Lens from a Gaming Industry Vet
Tung, a former Bungie employee who played key roles indevelopingHalo 2andDestiny, recently shared his perspective on the evolving game development models.
Now leading Theorycraft Games, Tung believes the live service model offers advantages over the traditional model.
I always felt like in the $60 boxed product model that I was having to make decisions that were not in the best interest of players. It was in the best interest of, how do we sell as many copies in the first 48 hours as we can? One of the huge strengths of the games as a service model is you may be long term, you can think long term in terms of what is best for the player, and how does that overlap with what is best for the company? I think it allows you to make much, much, much better decisions overall.
Under the traditional model, studios face a major challenge in covering development costs and turning a profit from a single purchase price.
We Almost Got a Different Final Cutscene in ‘Destiny 2: The Final Shape’ and Thank God That Didn’t Come Through
This can result in rushed releases or limited post-launch support as studios find it difficult to continue investing in a product that has already been sold.
As Tung puts it:
I would wager that any developer who has ever worked in the $60 box product model, up until the point where E3 was cancelled, has a story about the E3 build. It’s like, let’s jam as much bull**** vaporware into the build as we can in the next three months because we have to have a huge showing at E3 because it’s our one opportunity to talk to our audience before we launch the game.I would have to wager that some hugely significant percentage of those E3 efforts ended up on the cutting room floor because they were half-baked and caused people to crunch and really have to make huge sacrifices to get it in.
Tung argues that the Games as a Service model promotes a more sustainable development cycle. Developers can continuously invest in improving and expanding their games with ongoing revenue streams from in-game purchases or subscriptions.
Continuous Evolution and the Live Service Model
Imagine a game that consistently expands and adjusts. Ongoing updates can introduce fresh features, encounters, and material, ensuring that players remain interested for extended periods.
Supervive is the Brainchild of Valorant, League of Legends, Overwatch and Apex Legends Devs, and It Looks More Carnage Than All Four
Titles such asLeague of LegendsandDestiny, where Tung worked as an executive producer, serve as excellent examples of this concept. These free-to-play MOBAs have enthralled millions for more than a decade by delivering regular updates with new characters, balance adjustments, and gameplay modes.
Although the Games as a Service model is not a cure-all, Tung recognizes the need for a fair and transparent monetization system that prioritizes player value.
When implemented correctly, the live service model can cultivate a stronger relationship between developers and players, allowing for ongoing improvement and creating a sense of community around the game.
Helldivers 2is a recent examplethat blends traditional gameplay with live service elements. It offers a full campaign from the beginning and the option for Games as a Service.
The game universe evolves with new regions, missions, and challenges. Player decisions impact the game world, potentially affecting the overall game state and storyline.
The live service model is not without its detractors, but Tung’s viewpoint, shaped by his involvement with major gaming franchises, presents a valuable alternative perspective.
As the gaming industry keeps changing, the live service model, which allows for ongoing development and player involvement, is expected to continue as a significant influence in the coming years.
Is GaaS a positive? Is it the future of gaming? Let us know in the comments below!
Chad Glapion
Articles Published :37
Chad Glapion is an avid gamer since the mid-’90s, with a passion for narrative-focused and grand strategy games. He’s also a pet dog and reptile enthusiast and a writer of speculative fiction. Personal favorite games include the original Mass Effect trilogy & the Crusader Kings series.
